BRIDGET LIANG
"BETTER TRY THAN NEVER."
2013年6月30日星期日
2013年6月29日星期六
EXP_3_FINAL SUBMISSION_MASHUP
This article, by Michael Mehaffy and Nikos Salingaros, originally
appeared in Metropolis Mag as “Science for
Designers: The Meaning of Complexity.“ http://www.archdaily.com/391794/designers-don-t-get-science-and-that-s-a-dangerous-thing/
http://www.katarxis3.com/Alexander_Architecture_Science.htm
http://seedmagazine.com/content/article/can_architecture_shape_science/
Today’s designers
seem to love using new ideas coming from science. Science, in particular, has profoundly influenced
architects, informing their knowledge of materials, geometries, volumes and
natural forms. The purpose of a scientific
view of architecture is to generate
startling new designs, and that means more
satisfying design, more eternal forms, more valuable places, more beautiful
buildings. Newer
structures often have an obvious analog in elements of the natural sciences, For environmental designers and planners, knowing this phenomenon of
“emergence” is the key to getting things right. In
recent years, architects have also been called upon to devise new buildings, in
which scientists will research, experiment, theorize, discuss, reevaluate and
present findings. Some scientists
shy away from the notion that nature “aims” for anything. . How architecture and science will
define each other through this encounter is still to be seen, but it begins a
dialogue that places architecture in a position to enable science to reach
further into the unknown and come up with answers to life’s mysteries
EXP3_FIN_SUBMISSION_The Folly&Elevator&Brige in Sketchup
2013年6月28日星期五
订阅:
博文 (Atom)